The court should take note of the unscrupulous behavior of the banks and take strict action

- To the point-Ajit Parrot

- If there is an owner, the banks work. A few tenants are breadwinners of bank employees, tenants cannot be treated like they are

The Reserve Bank's decision to withdraw Rs 2,000 notes added to the rush. Following this decision, it was announced that citizens will be able to deposit their two thousand rupee notes in banks and get a 500 rupee note in return from a certain date to a specific date. Neither the Reserve Bank nor the Central Government has set any preconditions for this. But some banks started harassing the citizens by being obstinate.

A note of two thousand rupees is useful. Apart from that, every citizen has personal experience of bank employees' tumakhi. Nationalization of banks was one of the few wrong decisions Indira Gandhi made as Prime Minister. No citizen of the country can hold his hand and say that nationalization of banks has benefited the people. On the contrary, the hardships of the people have increased. No one can say how Congress benefited from this step of Indiraji. Yes, Morarji Desai resigned from the post of Finance Minister and Indiraji could take steps as per her convenience, but till date no political party, leader or government has taken note of the tremendous injustice done to the people of the country.

Everyone knows that bank employees behave rudely with their customers. Bank employees behave arbitrarily due to headstrong unions. Those people tend to forget that there is a householder, so the hearth of their house burns. Banks run if there are owners. In a few harsh words, the host is the breadwinner of the bank employee, the host cannot be treated like one. And yes, it is worth wondering how the ghatiyas, who fled abroad after committing billions of rupees scams, could have committed such huge scams without the cooperation of the bank staff.

Even two-three months ago when a legal agreement was made with the owners of the lockers in the banks, the banks behaved arbitrarily. In one state, a document of one hundred rupees was signed, while in another state, an agreement of three hundred or five hundred rupees was made. Thus there was no uniformity. Banks that charge arbitrary rent for lockers are not willing to take responsibility for the people in the lockers. He takes a one-sided stance on that issue as well.

In the current circumstances, any alert citizen should approach the court or the court should take note of this incident (suo moto) and take up this issue. In today's scenario, such a person trusts the courts more than the government, the so-called people's representatives, the police or anyone else. The court should seek explanation from the banks. A bank that bothers people despite the clear instructions of the Reserve Bank commits two crimes - one, disobeys the order of the Reserve Bank and two, cheats lakhs of citizens who come to return Rs 2,000 notes. Bank owners can also be among such citizens.

Still, the central government is thinking of making a four-day week to see foreign countries. For that, a condition is being considered to increase the working hours to four days in a week. It will not be surprising if the union starts threatening non-cooperation and agitation on the issue of increasing working hours. After all this, everyone would now be thinking that the central government should now cancel the nationalization of banks. True or not?