Donald Trump education.

Two days ago, on February 24, two years have passed since the Russian attack on Ukraine. But in Kiev (the capital of Ukraine), Moscow and Brussels (headquarters of the European Union and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization i.e. NATO), all eyes are on the US presidential election in November. There is none of the heroism that NATO had earlier lit up the international horizon with. There is a picture of Ukraine being pitted like a baby goat against the Russian tiger by the neighboring countries. The war in Ukraine will go down in history not for an enemy nation but for a betrayal by an ally. The people of Ukraine are scattered. Family members are separated from each other. Missile debris has fallen in the fields. Thousands of children have become victims of war.

Now after two years of this war, the new karam kundli will be based on the election of the US president. Donald Trump's nomination from the Republican Party is considered certain in these elections and there is a strong possibility that he will become the President again. There is also a desire among the American people to reinstate this politician. Americans are tensed by Biden's maturity. Even his army has found a fanatical leader. Being a strong democracy, Trump, who is not considered very successful, wants to be challenged again. Biden's condition is like a commander's differently abled horse. Hardly anything could be worse for the European Union and Ukraine than a Trump victory. This was proven on February 10 when Trump loudly said that America under his leadership will not defend a NATO member country and that he hates a country that spends less than two percent of its gross domestic product (GDP) on defense.

Instead, Donald Trump has insisted that he will tell Russia to do whatever it wants. These statements of Trump have turned the fate of Ukraine upside down. The statement, which recently dominated the Munich Security Conference, violates Article 5 of the 75-year-old treaty, which states that an attack on any NATO member state will be considered an attack on all NATO members. This is obviously bad news for Ukraine as it is already struggling with a shortage of defense equipment. On the other hand, the Republican-dominated lower house of the US Congress opposes providing military and civilian aid to Ukraine. Ukraine is not a full member of NATO, but it is part of a decade-old program that means it cooperates closely with NATO. A military strike on Ukraine is also a threat to Europe's security.

NATO members angered Trump and his predecessors by offering small aid to Ukraine, albeit at a lower cost than expected. First of all, E. S. In 2006, NATO defense ministers made this pledge because it would make it easier for allies to bear the cost-burden of military aid. e. S. This was reiterated when Russia annexed Crimea in 2014. The Trump administration was right to say that most NATO members are reneging on defense budget commitments. e. S. In 2014, only three member states spent two percent of their GDP on defence. The situation has since changed as Europe fears that Russia may attack at any time. This year, 18 of NATO's 31 member states are expected to achieve this goal.

The Baltic countries, which would act as the first line of defense in the event of a Russian attack, have begun strengthening their eastern borders. Given the disparity between Europe and Russia in both conventional and nuclear weapons, it is unclear how NATO would be able to defend effectively without US military assistance. Analysts say Europe will have to spend more. The question for India is how it should respond to NATO apart from America. This group has been important in the post-World War II security architecture. It is to be noted that in June last year, India rejected US sentiments that it wanted India to show its presence in China-centric NATO Plus.