Robots and artificial intelligence are becoming human faster than expected


- Patent applications for inventions made by Aina are pending in the US

- Occasional

- Will a human who believes everything created by himself to be true give a legal right to a robot in the future?

Admit it or not, like it or not, Artificial Intelligence (AI for short) is growing faster than expected. AI is increasingly being researched to 'help' or 'simplify' the human race.

Whether or not artificial intelligence should be legally recognized, whether an AI-created object is a legitimate citizen, entity or person, whether or not the object or argument created by it is considered valid or acceptable is being vigorously debated. In 2017, Saudi Arabia became the first country to accept a robot named Sophia as a citizen. This robot, made by a company called Hansons Robotics of Hong Kong, is now a citizen of the country. She expressed her desire to become a mother at a conference in India, created a painting. This robot caused the problem. Can this artificially created citizen or this product accepted to work have its own legal rights or not?

According to the Cambridge Dictionary, a robot is a machine that can perform a specific task automatically under the control of a computer. According to Oxford, a robot is a machine that can perform complex tasks on its own. This definition of the word robot has now changed. Robots are now becoming more and more human through artificial intelligence. Not only has he gained the power to think independently like a human, he has now reached the point of being able to feel sensations.

It is a hotly debated topic whether a machine-turned-human robot should have legal rights. Some countries have so far banned the use of AI for academic research. It is believed that AI will take away many clerical jobs like book keeping, ticket booking, cash counting and withdrawal from the world. Experiments with driverless cars have been in full swing for quite some time. Cars of the future to be self-driving. In this changing scenario to give human-like rights as a citizen to an artificially created robot or not? Will Sophia, who becomes a citizen of Saudi Arabia, get the right to vote, 'marry', get insurance or not?

The amount of investment and ongoing research into AI development ensures that this technology will gradually become more intuitive to humans. Of course, many questions are also arising with this intuition. Can an AI work as a doctor or not, pass a medical exam or not, as a legal advisor can it guide, fight a case in court or not? Experiments have also started in this direction. Loans in banking based on machine learning and AI, problem solving of bank customers etc. are already implemented today. In this situation, discussion, argument and controversy have started in the world even on the legal validity of AI. The laws of no country in the world grant rights as creators to robots or AIs. Indian law is completely silent on this. Patent applications for AI's creation or inventions are pending in the US, while a case of copyright infringement against the robot is pending at the European Patent Office.

Even so, man has a habit of creating something that did not exist and believing it to be true. It is only through this habit that man is ruling over other animals of the world. The most famous book 'Sapiens' by the Israeli writer and one of the most influential intellectuals of our time, Yuel Noah Harari, begins with this line of thought: 'Things like God, nation-state, money, human rights exist only on the basis of one's own thought. Sapiens (ie mankind) rule the world today.'

Existence based on thought means things that man himself has created. Adam-Eve is an imagination of man, not reality. Many gods and goddesses, religious symbols and names have been 'invented' in cultures around the world. To make things easier, to protect against danger, to protect oneself or one's community from others... all these are created on the basis of various excuses, arguments or reasons. At present, there is no clear position regarding the rights of robots and AI, but it is certain that a human being who believes everything created by himself to be true will definitely consider it eternally true in the future.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A sign of the second revolution in China after Mao's revolution

Talk of Delhi: Reconciliation with Gehlot, Pilot supporters confused

China's Insidious Privacy

Adhir's allegation, Mamata's daily expenses of 3 lakhs

Talking about Delhi: The government was shocked by the report about the China border

A minor was killed in public in Delhi, people watched the spectacle

Uproar in UP politics due to attack on Chandrasekhar Ravan

Tribal bus services: Even the tribals do not like private bus service very much

Talking about Delhi: Government will bring home loan subsidy scheme

Ultimatum of Akal Takht, terrorism will flare up in Punjab?